Time for a Coaching Change

[Muskieman]

http://www.sbncollegehockey.com/ecac...osiers-mayotte

Please, please do not let #5 be the choice.

The title of this Thread was/is appropriate, but not for Clarkson. The SLU Thread on USCHO is very interesting these days. So are comments on the FB Page. SLU fans are NOT happy for many reasons with 'Carvel -- myself included.

[daredevilcu]

http://www.sbncollegehockey.com/ecac...osiers-mayotte

Please, please do not let #5 be the choice.

[daredevilcu]

Is this U Mass Lowel, or U Mass Amherst ?

Amherst. Lowell still Had a season going

[Bill'70]

Which UMass

Is this U Mass Lowel, or U Mass Amherst ?

[Drew]

He graduated from UMass, so it kind of makes sense for the connection there, and he definitely put together a resume with SLU in a short time. Still a shocker.

WOW, just WOW.

[daredevilcu]

He graduated from UMass, so it kind of makes sense for the connection there, and he definitely put together a resume with SLU in a short time. Still a shocker.

[vicb]

He did. It's official.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

WOW. No one was talking about him for that job.

[joecct]

Coaching changes down the road about 10 miles. Carvel expected to take the UMass job.

http://www.masslive.com/umasshockey/...nt_with_s.html

He did. It's official.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

[daredevilcu]

Coaching changes down the road about 10 miles. Carvel expected to take the UMass job.

http://www.masslive.com/umasshockey/...nt_with_s.html

[joecct]

If Schafer leaves, would Cornell be interested in alum Casey Jones?

Is there mud in Potsdam in spring?

[dave techer]

Watch UMass. Mike Schafer has interviewed. http://www.gazettenet.com/Sports/UMa...-names-1168522

If Schafer leaves, would Cornell be interested in alum Casey Jones?

[joecct]

Watch UMass. Mike Schafer has interviewed. http://www.gazettenet.com/Sports/UMa...-names-1168522

[joecct]

Courtesy of Brad Schlossman - Grand Forks Herald (http://undhockey.areavoices.com/?p=102577)

Percentage of coaches with 10-plus years at current school
50 percent — men’s college hockey.
38.6 percent — college baseball.
28.6 percent — women’s college hockey.
23.2 percent — women’s college basketball.
18.4 percent — men’s college basketball.
15.6 percent — FCS football.
7 percent — FBS football.

Percentage of coaches with 10-plus years at current pro team
12.5 percent — NFL.
3.3 percent — MLB.
3.3 percent — NBA.
0 percent — NHL.
0 percent — WNBA.

The college ‘deans’
47 years — Tony Rossi, Siena baseball
40 years — Jim Boeheim, Syracuse men’s basketball
38 years — Harry Perretta, Villanova women’s basketball
36 years — Jimmye Laycock, William & Mary football
32 years — Red Berenson, Michigan men’s hockey, and Gary Wright, American International College
21 years — Katey Stone, Harvard women’s hockey
17 years — Bob Stoops, Oklahoma football, and Kirk Ferentz, Iowa football

The pro ‘deans’
20 years — Gregg Popovich, NBA, San Antonio Spurs
16 years — Mike Scioscia, MLB, L.A. Angels
16 years — Bill Belichick, NFL, New England Patriots
9 years — Claude Julien, NHL, Boston Bruins
6 years — Cheryl Reeve, WNBA, Minnesota Lynx

College men’s hockey’s longest tenured coaches
32 years – Red Berenson, Michigan
32 years – Gary Wright, American International
28 years – Rick Gotkin, Mercyhurst
26 years – Dick Umile, New Hampshire
24 years – Bob Daniels, Ferris State
23 years – Don Vaughan, Colgate
22 years – Rand Pecknold, Quinnipiac
22 years – Jerry York, Boston College
21 years – Mike Schafer, Cornell
19 years – Bob Gaudet, Dartmouth
19 years – Frank Serratore, Air Force
17 years – Don Lucia, Minnesota
17 years – Rico Blasi, Miami
17 years – Wayne Wilson, RIT
16 years – Scott Sandelin, Minnesota Duluth
15 years – Tom Serratore, Bemidji State
15 years – Dave Burkholder, Niagara
14 years – Mike Eaves, Wisconsin
14 years – Walt Kyle, Northern Michigan
14 years – Ryan Soderquist, Bentley

[daredevilcu]

Hockey has no good measures for time of possession. You know that and I know that. Collegehockeynews uses what it out there but they are not good and the proof is in this year's CU games.

The Corsi method only measures shots taken against shots allowed. It has no measure of quality shots taken vs. allowed, and might I say shots taken is not time of possession. A team can take 20 shots per game from crappy angles over by the boards and get the same value as if they were taken from the slot between the circles. Which 20 shots would YOU want your team to take? Scoring percentage is about as good a measure of possession as Corsi's methods. 8.3% of our shots go in, so that tells me we don't take too many "good shots". We are not 13th in the country in scoring percentage.

A better, more telling statistic, that is not measured is actual time of possession in control of the puck. Yes, it would be hard to measure but I can tell you we would not be in 13th in the Nation in that category. Another possession measure that isn't measured is forced & unforced puck transitions. We might be in the top five in unforced puck transitions (in the negative way). With the means of capturing every game electronically, these actual measures of possession might come to fruition to replace a comparative measure of generic shots between two teams. Does field goal attempts indicate time of possession in football?

I'm in total alignment/agreement with FireKnight on his comments above.

The enhanced CORSI method, I BELIEVE it's called Fenwick, removes blocked shots from the counts. We're up there too. CORSI has proved to be a solid predictor of postseason success, so I'll go ahead and rely on that as a solid enough indicator of possession. Time in zone would be great to get too though.

[Remember Walker]

Hockey has no good measures for time of possession. You know that and I know that. Collegehockeynews uses what it out there but they are not good and the proof is in this year's CU games.

The Corsi method only measures shots taken against shots allowed. It has no measure of quality shots taken vs. allowed, and might I say shots taken is not time of possession. A team can take 20 shots per game from crappy angles over by the boards and get the same value as if they were taken from the slot between the circles. Which 20 shots would YOU want your team to take? Scoring percentage is about as good a measure of possession as Corsi's methods. 8.3% of our shots go in, so that tells me we don't take too many "good shots". We are not 13th in the country in scoring percentage.

A better, more telling statistic, that is not measured is actual time of possession in control of the puck. Yes, it would be hard to measure but I can tell you we would not be in 13th in the Nation in that category. Another possession measure that isn't measured is forced & unforced puck transitions. We might be in the top five in unforced puck transitions (in the negative way). With the means of capturing every game electronically, these actual measures of possession might come to fruition to replace a comparative measure of generic shots between two teams. Does field goal attempts indicate time of possession in football?

I'm in total alignment/agreement with FireKnight on his comments above.